|
|
|
Hawkins
v. Masters Farms, Inc.
|
|
2003
WL 21555767 (D.Kan. 2003)
|
|
What's
Going On?
|
|
Defendants move to
dismiss Plaintiffs' federal diversity action on the grounds that
complete diversity does not exist between the parties in a lawsuit
arising from a traffic accident between Defendants and Plaintiffs'
decedent.
|
|
Who's
Who?
|
|
Plaintiffs :
|
Mary Ann Hawkins
– representative of the estate of James Patrick Creal,
citizen of Missouri; and Rachel Baldwin – [heir of
James Creal], citizens of Missouri.
|
|
Defendants :
|
Masters Farms,
Inc. – owner of tractor that collided with James Creal's
automobile, citizen of Kansas; Jack E. Masters –
driver of tractor that collided with James Creal, citizen of
Kansas; et al.
|
|
Facts:
|
|
In December 2000,
James Creal was killed in an automobile accident after his car
collided with a tractor, driven by Defendant Jack Masters, near
Troy, Kansas. Creal was living in Troy with his with his wife,
Elizabeth, and her two children at the time of his death. Creal
met Elizabeth in November 1999, when Creal was living with his
mother in St. Joseph, Missouri. In January 2000, Creal began
spending the night at Elizabeth's apartment in Troy, and
contributed to the household costs; however he returned to his
mother's home daily to shower and change clothes after work. In
March 2000, after Elizabeth and her children moved to a different
apartment in Troy, Creal brought his belongings there and ceased
showering and changing at his mother's house. Creal also opened a
joint checking account with Elizabeth to help pay the household
bills. Creal married Elizabeth in July 2000 and they moved into a
house in Troy in November 2000. At the time of Creal's death, many
of his important documents reflected his mother's Missouri
address. Creal's death certificate listed Kansas as his residence;
however, his estate alleges that he resided in Missouri at the
time of his death. Plaintiffs Mary Ann Hawkins, representative of
James Creal's estate, and Rachel Baldwin, [heir of James Creal],
brought a federal diversity action against Defendant Jack Masters,
and Defendant Masters Farms, Inc., the owner of the tractor
involved in the collision. Plaintiffs are both citizens of
Missouri. Defendants are Kansas citizens. At trial, Elizabeth
stated that she and Creal had thought about moving to Missouri,
but had not looked for houses, there. Defendants move to dismiss
Plaintiffs' federal diversity action on the grounds that complete
diversity does not exist between the parties.
|
|
Issue:
|
|
May a person be a
citizen of one state although he or she maintains connections with
another state?
|
|
Decision:
|
|
Yes. Plaintiffs
bear the burden of proving that jurisdiction is proper. The
presumption is against federal jurisdiction. Although Plaintiff
Hawkins is a Missouri citizen, because she is a legal
representative of Mr. Creal's estate, her citizenship shall be
determined by Mr. Creal's citizenship. For purposes of determining
whether diversity jurisdiction exists, a person is a “citizen”
of the state in which he or she is domiciled,
and for adults, domicile
is established by physical presence in a place and the display of
an intent to remain there. At the time of his death, Mr. Creal had
lived with his wife in Troy, Kansas for nearly one year. Mr. Creal
contributed to household costs, and had moved his belongings to
their home in Kansas. Mr. Creal had established his physical
presence in Kansas and displayed the intent to remain there. The
connections that Mr. Creal maintained with Missouri and his
“floating intention” to return there are insufficient
to overcome the evidence that he was domiciled
in Kansas when he died. Plaintiffs, however, have failed to carry
their burden of showing the existence of complete diversity.
Defendants' motion to dismiss is therefore granted.
|
|
Basic
Rule:
|
|
For purposes of
determining whether diversity jurisdiction exists, a person is a
“citizen” of the state in which he or she is domiciled
and, for adults, domicile
is established by physical presence in a place and the display of
an intent to remain there.
|
|
Terms:
|
|
Domicile :
|
The place where an
individual is physically present and that the individual regards
as his or her permanent home, where he or she intends to return
even when not residing there.
|
|
|