|
|
|
Bridgeport
Music, Inc. v. 11C Music
|
|
202
F.R.D. 229 (M.D. Tenn., Nashville Division 2001)
|
|
What's
Going On?
|
|
[Motions by
Defendants for severance
and dismissal of Plaintiffs' copyright infringement claims against
over 770 entities, on grounds of improper joinder
under FRCP 20 and failure to give a “short and plain
statement” of Plaintiffs' claims.]
|
|
Who's
Who?
|
|
Plaintiffs :
|
Bridgeport
Music, Inc., et al – entities engaged in
publishing, recording, and distributing music.
|
|
Defendants :
|
11 C Music, et
al – over 770 music and entertainment companies.
|
|
Facts:
|
|
Plaintiffs—publishers,
recorders, and distributors of music—brought a copyright
infringement action against Defendants, over 770 music and
entertainment companies. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants sampled
music owned by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' complaint includes 486
counts, most of which contain multiple claims. Defendants move to
dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint, arguing that Plaintiffs' complaint,
which is 901 pages long, violates FRCP 8 by not giving a
“short and plain statement of its claims, and FRCP 20
because Defendants are not properly joined.
|
|
Issue:
|
|
May parties whose
alleged wrongs arise from unrelated occurrences be joined
as defendants in a lawsuit?
|
|
Decision:
|
|
No. FRCP 20
provides for the permissive joinder
of multiple parties in one action as defendants in order to
promote judicial economy and trial convenience; however, two
tests, the common question test and the transactional test, must
be met before parties may be joined.
The common question test is often easily satisfied. The
transactional test, however, requires that, to be joined,
parties must assert rights, or have rights asserted against them,
that arise from related activities. This test generally requires a
case by case analysis. In this case, although certain Defendants
were involved in multiple instances of copyright infringement,
each alleged act of sampling represents a discrete occurrence.
Even if joinder
were permissible in this case, the court would allow severance
to avoid unreasonable prejudice to Defendants, and to avoid
inconvenience to the court. The case is unmanageable in its
current form. Defendants would be faced with an onslaught of
material irrelevant to their role in the case, and the court is
not even large enough to accommodate all of the parties involved.
The copyright infringement counts should proceed separately as 477
individual cases. Defendants' FRCP 8 motions are moot
due to the court's determination. [Motions for severance
granted and motions to dismiss denied.]
|
|
Basic
Rule:
|
|
Parties to be
joined must
assert rights, or have rights asserted against them, that arise
from related activities.
|
|
Terms:
|
|
Joinder :
|
The uniting of
several parties or causes of action in a single suit.
|
|
Moot :
|
Without
significance.
|
|
Sample :
|
To copy portions of
prior musical recordings directly onto new musical recordings.
|
|
Severance :
|
The court-ordered
separation of multiple parties' claims.
|
|
|