|
Bell v. Novick
Transfer Co.
|
|
17
F.R.D. 279 (D. Md. 1955)
|
|
What's
Going On?
|
|
Defendants move to
dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint [under rule 12(b)(6)] for failure to
state a claim against Defendants upon which relief can be granted.
|
|
Who's
Who?
|
|
Plaintiffs :
|
Ronald Bell
– infant injured in automobile accident. Raymond and
Levada Bell – parents and representatives of Ronald
Bell.
|
|
Defendants :
|
Novick Transfer
Co. and Katie Marie Parsons – owners of the
tractor-trailer involved in the accident in this case. Morris
Jarrett Coburn, III – operator of tractor-trailer for
Novick and Parsons.
|
|
Facts:
|
|
Plaintiffs'
automobile was struck by Defendants' tractor trailer, operated by
Defendant Coburn, and owned by Defendants Novick Transfer Co. and
Katie Marie Parsons. Plaintiff Ronald Bell, an infant, was
injured, and Plaintiffs filed a tort action in a Maryland state
court. Plaintiffs' declaration alleged that Defendant Coburn
struck Plaintiffs' automobile while negligently operating the
tractor trailor, and that Plaintiffs' injuries and damages were
the direct result of Defendants' negligence. The case was removed
to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446.
Defendants move to dismiss the declaration [under rule 12(b)(6)]
for failure to state a claim against Defendants upon which relief
can be granted.
|
|
Issue:
|
|
Does a complaint
satisfy the pleading requirements FRCP 8 by alleging only
that the negligence of defendants caused an accident that resulted
in injury to the plaintiffs?
|
|
Decision:
|
|
Yes. FRCP 8
only requires the declaration to contain “a short and plain
statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to
relief.” Plaintiffs' declaration meets this requirement,
even if the courts of Maryland would require more. If a defendant
needs more information to prepare a defense, such information may
be obtained through other discovery procedures, such as
interrogatories under Rule 33, or other discovery procedures.
Under Rule 12(e), Defendant may only make a motion for a
“more definite statement” if it is truly necessary to
enable the party to frame a responsive pleading.
|
|
Basic
Rule:
|
|
A complaint meets
the pleading requirements of FRCP 8 if it contains a short
and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is
entitled to relief.
|
|
Terms:
|
|
Declaration :
|
A document
presenting the plaintiff's cause of action. (It is this court's
term for “complaint.”)
|
|
Interrogatory :
|
In pretrial
discovery, a written question submitted to an opposing party.
|
|
Removal :
|
The transfer of a
state action to federal court.
|